Generated from Common Ninja Comparison Tables's audit data
Common Ninja Comparison Tables scores 71/100 across 6 category checks, which puts it in the healthy band — focused gaps rather than systemic problems. Strengths: title optimization at 88/100 and visual assets at 88/100 carry the headline — both above the 71/100 overall. Watch-items: languages (50/100) and categories & discoverability (50/100) drag the average down; lifting languages is the single largest available lever. Per-category breakdown below.
This is an independent listing audit for Common Ninja Comparison Tables on Wix. It scored 71/100 (grade B) on today's snapshot. Top strength: Visual Assets at 88/100. Biggest gap: Categories & Discoverability at 50/100. We re-audit every 24 hours from the canonical Wix listing.
Six weighted areas, pass / warning / fail per check, tiers at 85 / 65. Full methodology · Glossary
Last updated: July 8, 2026
Common Ninja Comparison Tables's overall score of 71/100 is a healthy result with specific areas to tighten, computed as the weighted average of 6 category checks. The spread is highly polarized across categories — 3 categories score above the headline number and 3 score below. The strongest category is Title Optimization (88/100, +17 vs overall); the weakest is Languages (50/100), 21 points below the overall — a meaningful but not dominant gap. Top three by score: Title Optimization (88), Visual Assets (88), Description & Content (78).
Scoring criteria, category weightings, and the full rubric (identical across every Wix App Market listing AppRanks audits) are documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: [email protected].
Common Ninja Comparison Tables scored 71/100 in the AppRanks listing audit — a healthy overall result. The score is the weighted average of 6 category checks: Title Optimization 88/100, Description & Content 78/100, Visual Assets 88/100, Categories & Discoverability 50/100, Technical & Support 58/100, Languages 50/100. Each category is scored against a fixed rubric that is identical for every app on the platform, so scores are directly comparable across Wix listings.
Common Ninja Comparison Tables's strongest audit area is Title Optimization, scored at 88/100. Of the 4 checks AppRanks runs in this category, 3 pass cleanly, with the remainder in warning rather than failing state. This is the dimension a competing listing would need to match before Common Ninja Comparison Tables loses its current edge in this category.
The weakest area in Common Ninja Comparison Tables's audit is Categories & Discoverability, scored at 50/100. The failing checks are feature tags, each with a concrete fix described below. Tightening this category is the highest-impact change available to the listing — its weight in the overall score makes it the lever most likely to move the headline number on the next refresh.