Effects vs Fancy Web Effects

Based on the data on this page, Effects is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Fancy Web Effects's 2.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: Effects at Paid, Fancy Web Effects at Paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Effects; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Fancy Web Effects's 8-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Effects's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Effects or Fancy Web Effects cheaper?

Both Effects and Fancy Web Effects offer paid plans only. Effects starts at Paid; Fancy Web Effects starts at Paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Effects or Fancy Web Effects?

Effects has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 4 reviews) compared to Fancy Web Effects (2.8★ from 8 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Effects or Fancy Web Effects?

Effects holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 2.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Effects or Fancy Web Effects?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Fancy Web Effects has the deeper published review base (8 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Wix App Market site owners?

Effects typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). Fancy Web Effects typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Effects and Fancy Web Effects?

Migration support varies by app and category. Effects and Fancy Web Effects both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Effects" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.