Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Custom reports & analytics for sales, inventory, orders & customers. Schedule, export & share.
| Report Toaster | Theme Scientist A/B Testing | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Easy A/B testing with no code. Schedule changes to see which AB test boosts conversion rates.
| Metric | Report Toaster: Custom Reports | Theme Scientist A/B Testing |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 218 | 13 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free trial available |
| Built for Shopify | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Apr 2021 | Mar 2020 |
Based on the data on this page, Report Toaster: Custom Reports is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 4.9★ vs Theme Scientist A/B Testing's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Report Toaster: Custom Reports at Free plan available, Theme Scientist A/B Testing at Free trial available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Report Toaster: Custom Reports has the larger user base (218 reviews vs 13), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Theme Scientist A/B Testing's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Report Toaster: Custom Reports; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Theme Scientist A/B Testing's 13-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Report Toaster: Custom Reports's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Report Toaster: Custom Reports audit • Theme Scientist A/B Testing audit
| Keyword | Report Toaster | Theme Scientist A/B Testing |
|---|---|---|
| custom reports analytics | #1 | Not ranked |
| custom reports | #2 | Not ranked |
| custom report generation | #5 | Not ranked |
| audit test kw | Not ranked | #60 |
Both Report Toaster: Custom Reports and Theme Scientist A/B Testing offer paid plans only. Report Toaster: Custom Reports starts at Free plan available; Theme Scientist A/B Testing starts at Free trial available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Report Toaster: Custom Reports has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 218 reviews) compared to Theme Scientist A/B Testing (4.0★ from 13 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Report Toaster: Custom Reports holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Report Toaster: Custom Reports has the deeper published review base (218 vs 13), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Report Toaster: Custom Reports typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (218 reviews). Theme Scientist A/B Testing typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (13 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Report Toaster: Custom Reports and Theme Scientist A/B Testing both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Theme Scientist A/B Testing" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.