Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Accurate accounting for retail and B2B sales, payments, and product details
| QuickBooks Online | StatNexa | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Metric | QuickBooks Online | StatNexa |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 3.1k | 0 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free to install | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 9 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Feb 2015 | Sep 2024 |
Based on the data on this page, QuickBooks Online is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 4.8★ vs StatNexa's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: QuickBooks Online at Free to install, StatNexa at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. QuickBooks Online has the larger user base (3,120 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. StatNexa's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to QuickBooks Online; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — StatNexa's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than QuickBooks Online's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: QuickBooks Online audit • StatNexa audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | QuickBooks Online | StatNexa |
|---|---|---|
| accounting | #1 | Not ranked |
| financial | #1 | Not ranked |
| quickbooks | #1 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Both QuickBooks Online and StatNexa offer paid plans only. QuickBooks Online starts at Free to install; StatNexa starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. QuickBooks Online fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; StatNexa is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. QuickBooks Online has more onboarding documentation maturity (3,120 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
QuickBooks Online typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (3,120 reviews). StatNexa aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (0 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. QuickBooks Online and StatNexa both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from StatNexa" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
