Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Go beyond themes—create conversion-ready landing & product pages fast, no coding required.
| PageFly Landing Page Builder | PulpoAR Virtual Try On | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Sync supported beauty products. Let shoppers launch virtual try-on from storefront widgets.
| Metric | PageFly Landing Page Builder | PulpoAR Virtual Try On |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 5.6k | 0 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | 7 | — |
| Review velocity (30d) | 26 new | — |
| Languages | 9 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2017 | May 2026 |
Based on the data on this page, PageFly Landing Page Builder is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 4.9★ vs PulpoAR Virtual Try On's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: PageFly Landing Page Builder at Free plan available, PulpoAR Virtual Try On at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. PageFly Landing Page Builder has the larger user base (5,641 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. PulpoAR Virtual Try On's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to PageFly Landing Page Builder; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — PulpoAR Virtual Try On's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than PageFly Landing Page Builder's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: PageFly Landing Page Builder audit • PulpoAR Virtual Try On audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | PageFly Landing Page Builder | PulpoAR Virtual Try On |
|---|---|---|
| page | #1 | Not ranked |
| landing pages | #2 | Not ranked |
| landing page builder | #3 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
| Signal | PageFly Landing Page Builder | PulpoAR Virtual Try On |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.9 ★ (5.6k) | 0.0 ★ (0) |
| Rating distribution | 593% 42% 31% 21% 13% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
| Reviews · last 7 days | +6 | — |
| Reviews · last 30 days | +26 | — |
| Reviews · last 90 days | +110 | — |
Both PageFly Landing Page Builder and PulpoAR Virtual Try On offer paid plans only. PageFly Landing Page Builder starts at Free plan available; PulpoAR Virtual Try On starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. PageFly Landing Page Builder fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; PulpoAR Virtual Try On is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. PageFly Landing Page Builder has more onboarding documentation maturity (5,641 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
PageFly Landing Page Builder typically suits established stores with steady traffic based on its review-base composition (5,641 reviews). PulpoAR Virtual Try On aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (0 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. PageFly Landing Page Builder and PulpoAR Virtual Try On both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from PulpoAR Virtual Try On" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
Nice service. Can get back to me in a timely when I have questions
Shady, shady app, i uninstalled but their tracking code was still injected.
You guys always figure it out! Thanks so much!
the app is a little clunky but the live chat assistance is invaluable. thank you Dan!
No reviews yet.
