Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Edit the default robots.txt file using a simple editor without coding.
| MIT Custom Robots.txt Rules | Avada Accessibility Widget ADA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Ensure your store complies with accessibility laws, especially in Germany, the United States, EU,etc
| Metric | MIT Custom Robots.txt Rules | Avada Accessibility Widget ADA |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 297 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | — | 2 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 6 supported |
| Listed since | Oct 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Based on the data on this page, Avada Accessibility Widget ADA is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs MIT Custom Robots.txt Rules's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: MIT Custom Robots.txt Rules at Free plan available, Avada Accessibility Widget ADA at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Avada Accessibility Widget ADA has the larger user base (297 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. MIT Custom Robots.txt Rules's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Avada Accessibility Widget ADA; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — MIT Custom Robots.txt Rules's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Avada Accessibility Widget ADA's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: MIT Custom Robots.txt Rules audit • Avada Accessibility Widget ADA audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | MIT Custom Robots.txt Rules | Avada Accessibility Widget ADA |
|---|---|---|
| accessibility | Not ranked | #1 |
| accessibility widget | Not ranked | #1 |
| ada compliance | Not ranked | #1 |
| customer support tool | #225 | Not ranked |
| customer engagement chatbot | #239 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
Both MIT Custom Robots.txt Rules and Avada Accessibility Widget ADA offer paid plans only. MIT Custom Robots.txt Rules starts at Free plan available; Avada Accessibility Widget ADA starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. MIT Custom Robots.txt Rules fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Avada Accessibility Widget ADA is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. Avada Accessibility Widget ADA has more onboarding documentation maturity (297 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
MIT Custom Robots.txt Rules typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (0 reviews). Avada Accessibility Widget ADA aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (297 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. MIT Custom Robots.txt Rules and Avada Accessibility Widget ADA both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from MIT Custom Robots.txt Rules" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
