Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
SendWILL (Ecomsend): grow your list with popups, send email campaigns & automate sales on autopilot.
| CWILL Popup | MIT Content Protector | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Secure your store's images and text from theft by disabling right-click, copy, and shortcuts.
| Metric | CWILL Popup Email Marketing | MIT Content Protector |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 7.1k | 0 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Built for Shopify | ★ Yes | — |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | 5 | — |
| Review velocity (30d) | 67 new | — |
| Languages | 23 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Oct 2022 | Jan 2026 |
Based on the data on this page, CWILL Popup Email Marketing is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 4.9★ vs MIT Content Protector's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: CWILL Popup Email Marketing at Free, MIT Content Protector at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. CWILL Popup Email Marketing has the larger user base (7,081 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. MIT Content Protector's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to CWILL Popup Email Marketing; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — MIT Content Protector's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than CWILL Popup Email Marketing's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: CWILL Popup Email Marketing audit • MIT Content Protector audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | CWILL Popup | MIT Content Protector |
|---|---|---|
| popups | #2 | Not ranked |
| pop up | #2 | Not ranked |
| popup | #2 | Not ranked |
| text selection | Not ranked | #19 |
| content | Not ranked | #22 |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
| Signal | CWILL Popup | MIT Content Protector |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.9 ★ (7.1k) | 0.0 ★ (0) |
| Rating distribution | 595% 43% 31% 20% 11% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
| Reviews · last 7 days | +17 | — |
| Reviews · last 30 days | +67 | — |
| Reviews · last 90 days | +239 | — |
Both CWILL Popup Email Marketing and MIT Content Protector offer paid plans only. CWILL Popup Email Marketing starts at Free; MIT Content Protector starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. CWILL Popup Email Marketing fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; MIT Content Protector is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. CWILL Popup Email Marketing has more onboarding documentation maturity (7,081 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
CWILL Popup Email Marketing typically suits established stores with steady traffic based on its review-base composition (7,081 reviews). MIT Content Protector aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (0 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. CWILL Popup Email Marketing and MIT Content Protector both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from MIT Content Protector" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
Fast response to my question thank you ria
great help
Great assistance, they go beyond with service.
No reviews yet.
