Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| AR | PageFly Landing Page Builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| AR | PageFly Landing Page Builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Go beyond themes—create conversion-ready landing & product pages fast, no coding required.
| Metric | AR: Google CSS Program Partner | PageFly Landing Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 8 | ★ 5.6k |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free to install | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | ★ 5 |
| Featured placements | — | 7 |
| Review velocity (30d) | — | 27 new |
| Languages | 1 supported | 9 supported |
| Listed since | Jul 2023 | Sep 2017 |
AR: Google CSS Program Partner and PageFly Landing Page Builder are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Pricing entry tiers: AR: Google CSS Program Partner at Free to install, PageFly Landing Page Builder at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. PageFly Landing Page Builder has the larger user base (5,638 reviews vs 8), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. AR: Google CSS Program Partner's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: AR: Google CSS Program Partner audit • PageFly Landing Page Builder audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | AR | PageFly Landing Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| page | Not ranked | #1 |
| landing pages | Not ranked | #2 |
| landing page | Not ranked | #3 |
| wolf ar | #13 | Not ranked |
| google shopping | #110 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
| Signal | AR | PageFly Landing Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 5.0 ★ (8) | 4.9 ★ (5.6k) |
| Rating distribution | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— | 593% 42% 31% 21% 13% |
| Reviews · last 7 days | — | +6 |
| Reviews · last 30 days | — | +27 |
| Reviews · last 90 days | — | +110 |
No reviews yet.
Both AR: Google CSS Program Partner and PageFly Landing Page Builder offer paid plans only. AR: Google CSS Program Partner starts at Free to install; PageFly Landing Page Builder starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AR: Google CSS Program Partner (5.0★, 8 reviews) and PageFly Landing Page Builder (4.9★, 5,638 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. AR: Google CSS Program Partner fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; PageFly Landing Page Builder is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. PageFly Landing Page Builder has more onboarding documentation maturity (5,638 reviews vs 8), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
I have been using the Pagefly app since 2020 but haven't needed to use the chat function until today (July 2026). I wanted to make a change on a page but noticed that all of my pages are now labeled "Legacy" and the edit function is not available. Yakub was very helpful in explaining the change and providing a video on
Nice service. Can get back to me in a timely when I have questions
Shady, shady app, i uninstalled but their tracking code was still injected.
You guys always figure it out! Thanks so much!
AR: Google CSS Program Partner typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (8 reviews). PageFly Landing Page Builder aligns more with established stores with steady traffic (5,638 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. AR: Google CSS Program Partner and PageFly Landing Page Builder both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from AR: Google CSS Program Partner" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
