Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Embed accurate Glasses Virtual Try-On to boost engagement and remove customer doubts.
| Fittingbox Virtual Try‑On | PageFly Landing Page Builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Go beyond themes—create conversion-ready landing & product pages fast, no coding required.
| Metric | Fittingbox Virtual Try‑On | PageFly Landing Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 11 | ★ 5.6k |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | — | 7 |
| Review velocity (30d) | — | 25 new |
| Languages | 1 supported | 9 supported |
| Listed since | Sep 2023 | Sep 2017 |
PageFly Landing Page Builder edges out Fittingbox Virtual Try‑On on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: Fittingbox Virtual Try‑On at Free plan available, PageFly Landing Page Builder at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. PageFly Landing Page Builder has the larger user base (5,648 reviews vs 11), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Fittingbox Virtual Try‑On's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to PageFly Landing Page Builder; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Fittingbox Virtual Try‑On's 11-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than PageFly Landing Page Builder's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Fittingbox Virtual Try‑On audit • PageFly Landing Page Builder audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Fittingbox Virtual Try‑On | PageFly Landing Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| page | Not ranked | #1 |
| landing pages | Not ranked | #2 |
| landing page builder | Not ranked | #3 |
| virtual try | #6 | Not ranked |
| virtual try on | #7 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
| Signal | Fittingbox Virtual Try‑On | PageFly Landing Page Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.8 ★ (11) | 4.9 ★ (5.6k) |
| Rating distribution | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— | 593% 42% 31% 21% 13% |
| Reviews · last 7 days | — | +6 |
| Reviews · last 30 days | — | +25 |
| Reviews · last 90 days | — | +111 |
No reviews yet.
Both Fittingbox Virtual Try‑On and PageFly Landing Page Builder offer paid plans only. Fittingbox Virtual Try‑On starts at Free plan available; PageFly Landing Page Builder starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
PageFly Landing Page Builder has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 5,648 reviews) compared to Fittingbox Virtual Try‑On (4.8★ from 11 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Fittingbox Virtual Try‑On fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; PageFly Landing Page Builder is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. PageFly Landing Page Builder has more onboarding documentation maturity (5,648 reviews vs 11), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Fittingbox Virtual Try‑On typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (11 reviews). PageFly Landing Page Builder aligns more with established stores with steady traffic (5,648 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
You guys always figure it out! Thanks so much!
the app is a little clunky but the live chat assistance is invaluable. thank you Dan!
Mahedi, was so helpful. I have been having some difficulty with figuring out how to navigate the app and he came in and assisted me with figuring out how to answer my inquiry and with his help I was able to successfully figure out the problem and fix it.
LP作りや商品ページ作りを比較的簡単に行うことのできる最適なツールだと思います。サポートも迅速で親切でした。ご対応、感謝いたします。
Migration support varies by app and category. Fittingbox Virtual Try‑On and PageFly Landing Page Builder both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Fittingbox Virtual Try‑On" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
