Ruth vs FF

Based on the data on this page, FF: Factures Client en France is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs Ruth: Rechnungen & DATEV's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: FF: Factures Client en France at Free plan available, Ruth: Rechnungen & DATEV at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to FF: Factures Client en France; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Ruth: Rechnungen & DATEV's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than FF: Factures Client en France's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is FF: Factures Client en France or Ruth: Rechnungen & DATEV cheaper?

Both FF: Factures Client en France and Ruth: Rechnungen & DATEV offer paid plans only. FF: Factures Client en France starts at Free plan available; Ruth: Rechnungen & DATEV starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Should I choose FF: Factures Client en France or Ruth: Rechnungen & DATEV?

AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. FF: Factures Client en France does carry the larger published review base (43 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, FF: Factures Client en France or Ruth: Rechnungen & DATEV?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. FF: Factures Client en France has the deeper published review base (43 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Shopify App Store merchants?

FF: Factures Client en France typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (43 reviews). Ruth: Rechnungen & DATEV typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between FF: Factures Client en France and Ruth: Rechnungen & DATEV?

Migration support varies by app and category. FF: Factures Client en France and Ruth: Rechnungen & DATEV both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Ruth: Rechnungen & DATEV" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.