Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Optimize ads with Meta Pixel, Facebook CAPI, Improve product data & integrate with Facebook channel
| Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed | Rapi Tracking Facebook Pixels | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
Never miss any Data with multiple Facebook pixel tracking including the conversion api iOS 14.
| Metric | Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed | Rapi Tracking Facebook Pixels |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 856 | 49 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free to install |
| Built for Shopify | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | 2 | — |
| Languages | 1 supported | 9 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2020 | Dec 2021 |
Rapi Tracking Facebook Pixels edges out Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed at Free plan available, Rapi Tracking Facebook Pixels at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed has the larger user base (856 reviews vs 49), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Rapi Tracking Facebook Pixels's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Rapi Tracking Facebook Pixels; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed's 856-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Rapi Tracking Facebook Pixels's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed audit • Rapi Tracking Facebook Pixels audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed | Rapi Tracking Facebook Pixels |
|---|---|---|
| facebook pixel | #3 | #4 |
| facebook pixels | #4 | #5 |
| pixels | #4 | #6 |
| meta pixel | #2 | #9 |
| pixel | #2 | #10 |
Not featured in any section recently.
Both Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed and Rapi Tracking Facebook Pixels offer paid plans only. Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed starts at Free plan available; Rapi Tracking Facebook Pixels starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Rapi Tracking Facebook Pixels has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 49 reviews) compared to Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed (4.8★ from 856 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Rapi Tracking Facebook Pixels is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed has more onboarding documentation maturity (856 reviews vs 49), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (856 reviews). Rapi Tracking Facebook Pixels aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (49 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed and Rapi Tracking Facebook Pixels both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Rapi Tracking Facebook Pixels" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
