Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed | AR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed | AR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
Optimize ads with Meta Pixel, Facebook CAPI, Improve product data & integrate with Facebook channel
| Metric | Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed | AR: Google CSS Program Partner |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 862 | 8 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free to install |
| Built for Shopify | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | ★ 5 | 4 |
| Featured placements | 2 | — |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jan 2020 | Jul 2023 |
AR: Google CSS Program Partner edges out Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed at Free plan available, AR: Google CSS Program Partner at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed has the larger user base (862 reviews vs 8), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. AR: Google CSS Program Partner's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to AR: Google CSS Program Partner; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed's 862-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than AR: Google CSS Program Partner's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed audit • AR: Google CSS Program Partner audit
| Keyword | Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed | AR |
|---|---|---|
| meta pixel | #1 | Not ranked |
| facebook pixels | #1 | Not ranked |
| pixel | #1 | Not ranked |
| wolf ar | Not ranked | #13 |
| google shopping | Not ranked | #111 |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
Both Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed and AR: Google CSS Program Partner offer paid plans only. Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed starts at Free plan available; AR: Google CSS Program Partner starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AR: Google CSS Program Partner has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 8 reviews) compared to Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed (4.8★ from 862 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; AR: Google CSS Program Partner is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed has more onboarding documentation maturity (862 reviews vs 8), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (862 reviews). AR: Google CSS Program Partner aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (8 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed and AR: Google CSS Program Partner both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from AR: Google CSS Program Partner" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
