| ECF | SK Contact Form Builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Create strong forms easily with in just 3 steps using our easy-to-use SK Contact Form Builder app
| Metric | ECF: Contact Form Builder | SK Contact Form Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 43 | ★ 399 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 5 |
| Review velocity (30d) | 0 new | ★ 2 new |
| Languages | 1 supported | 33 supported |
| Listed since | Mar 2020 | Mar 2024 |
ECF: Contact Form Builder edges out SK Contact Form Builder on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: ECF: Contact Form Builder at Free plan available, SK Contact Form Builder at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
SK Contact Form Builder has the larger user base (399 reviews vs 43), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. ECF: Contact Form Builder's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to ECF: Contact Form Builder; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — SK Contact Form Builder's 399-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ECF: Contact Form Builder's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ECF: Contact Form Builder audit • SK Contact Form Builder audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | ECF | SK Contact Form Builder |
|---|---|---|
| contact form builder | #153 | #6 |
| contact us form | #18 | #71 |
| contact form | #19 | #7 |
| contact | #23 | #6 |
| contact and inquiry forms | #23 | #6 |
| Signal | ECF | SK Contact Form Builder |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.9 ★ (43) | 4.8 ★ (399) |
| Rating distribution | 593% 42% 32% 20% 12% | 596% 42% 31% 20% 11% |
| Reviews · last 7 days | +0 | +1 |
| Reviews · last 30 days | +0 | +2 |
| Reviews · last 90 days | +0 | +10 |
Both ECF: Contact Form Builder and SK Contact Form Builder offer paid plans only. ECF: Contact Form Builder starts at Free plan available; SK Contact Form Builder starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
ECF: Contact Form Builder has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 43 reviews) compared to SK Contact Form Builder (4.8★ from 399 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
ECF: Contact Form Builder holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. SK Contact Form Builder has the deeper published review base (399 vs 43), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
ECF: Contact Form Builder typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (43 reviews). SK Contact Form Builder typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (399 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Thanks for helping out. Good customer care service
ECF is an excellent App that has helped us gather user data for numerous projects. The customer support team is also very responsive and always quick to assist.
Really nice app and the customer support has been over and above. Thank you!
The tool is intuitive to use. The forms fulfilled exactly what we were looking for. The customer support and developers were extremely helpful, responsive, and quickly resolved an issue we had.
This app is incredibly user-friendly, with outstanding support and excellent service!
James and the support team have been fantastic, it feels great to use this app knowing that you're working with a team that has dedication and passion to understand and accommodate changes.
WARNING! This app crashed both our stores, changed the layout to mobile version when looking at the website on computer. Hidden products, a lot of products didnt show and it moved the whole site to the right so you could only see some parts of the website. WARNING! Shopify should really control what apps they allow on
Website crashes when installing this app, warning!
Migration support varies by app and category. ECF: Contact Form Builder and SK Contact Form Builder both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from ECF: Contact Form Builder" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
James Blanco provides excellent customer support. We needed two customizations for our intake form. James and his development team provided working implementations in short order. Polite, friendly, and knowledgeable, James is a pleasure to work with.
Alles bestens