Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Easy and smart page builder: build any stunning, sales-ready pages - now supercharged with AI
| EComposer Landing Page Builder | XO Insert Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | EComposer Landing Page Builder | XO Insert Code |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 3.4k | 103 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free |
| Built for Shopify | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | ★ 5 | 1 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | May 2022 | Sep 2018 |
EComposer Landing Page Builder and XO Insert Code are evenly matched on rating (4.9★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Pricing entry tiers: EComposer Landing Page Builder at Free plan available, XO Insert Code at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. EComposer Landing Page Builder has the larger user base (3,400 reviews vs 103), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. XO Insert Code's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: EComposer Landing Page Builder audit • XO Insert Code audit
| Keyword | EComposer Landing Page Builder | XO Insert Code |
|---|---|---|
| page builder | #2 | Not ranked |
| landing page builder | #2 | Not ranked |
| product content | Not ranked | #5 |
| ai page builder | #7 | Not ranked |
| scripts | Not ranked | #11 |
| Signal | EComposer Landing Page Builder | XO Insert Code |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.9 ★ (3.4k) | 5.0 ★ (103) |
| Rating distribution | 596% 42% 30% 20% 12% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
Both EComposer Landing Page Builder and XO Insert Code offer paid plans only. EComposer Landing Page Builder starts at Free plan available; XO Insert Code starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
EComposer Landing Page Builder (4.9★, 3,400 reviews) and XO Insert Code (5.0★, 103 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. EComposer Landing Page Builder fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; XO Insert Code is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. EComposer Landing Page Builder has more onboarding documentation maturity (3,400 reviews vs 103), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
EComposer Landing Page Builder typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (3,400 reviews). XO Insert Code aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (103 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Me gustó mucho la app, es algo complicada en algunos puntos de edición pero me sirve super bien, es bonita, tiene muchos features bonitos y ayudan mucho en soporte técnico!
Luna helped us with an issue with padding, 5/5 recommend this app
5 Star app! Easy to use and customise designs. I needed help and was able to live chat with Andy almost immediately. Very helpful - was able to help me fix the issue in only a few steps. Would definitely recommend!
Anna from Support Team is A++ class manager. Only the best recommendations.
No reviews yet.
Migration support varies by app and category. EComposer Landing Page Builder and XO Insert Code both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from XO Insert Code" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
