Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Accurate Facebook conversion tracking for Add to Cart, Checkout, & Purchase events with Pixel & CAPI
| Multi Facebook Pixel & CAPI | Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — |
Optimize ads with Meta Pixel, Facebook CAPI, Improve product data & integrate with Facebook channel
| Metric | Multi Facebook Pixel & CAPI | Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 5 | ★ 856 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free to install | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | — | 2 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Apr 2023 | Jan 2020 |
Multi Facebook Pixel & CAPI edges out Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: Multi Facebook Pixel & CAPI at Free to install, Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed has the larger user base (856 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Multi Facebook Pixel & CAPI's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Multi Facebook Pixel & CAPI; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed's 856-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Multi Facebook Pixel & CAPI's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Multi Facebook Pixel & CAPI audit • Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed audit
| Keyword | Multi Facebook Pixel & CAPI | Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed |
|---|---|---|
| meta pixel | #12 | #2 |
| facebook pixel | #17 | #4 |
| facebook pixels | #16 | #5 |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
Both Multi Facebook Pixel & CAPI and Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed offer paid plans only. Multi Facebook Pixel & CAPI starts at Free to install; Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Multi Facebook Pixel & CAPI has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 5 reviews) compared to Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed (4.8★ from 856 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Multi Facebook Pixel & CAPI fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed has more onboarding documentation maturity (856 reviews vs 5), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Multi Facebook Pixel & CAPI typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (5 reviews). Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (856 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Multi Facebook Pixel & CAPI and Omega Facebook Pixel Meta Feed both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Multi Facebook Pixel & CAPI" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
