Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Boost AEO & AI search visibility with AI SEO Audit Agent, On-Page SEO Optimizer, and SEO Checklist
| Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer | MIT Canonical URLs | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Easily set custom canonical tags/URLs. Fix duplicate content issues & prioritize URLs for crawling.
| Metric | Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer | MIT Canonical URLs |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 4.4k | 0 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 3 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 5 | 5 |
| Featured placements | 2 | — |
| Review velocity (30d) | 73 new | — |
| Languages | 10 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Apr 2020 | Jun 2025 |
Based on the data on this page, Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 4.9★ vs MIT Canonical URLs's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer at Free plan available, MIT Canonical URLs at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer has the larger user base (4,423 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. MIT Canonical URLs's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — MIT Canonical URLs's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer audit • MIT Canonical URLs audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer | MIT Canonical URLs |
|---|---|---|
| seo image optimizer | #1 | Not ranked |
| image optimizer | #2 | Not ranked |
| image optimization | #2 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
No tracked changes.
| Signal | Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer | MIT Canonical URLs |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.9 ★ (4.4k) | 0.0 ★ (0) |
| Rating distribution | 596% 43% 30% 20% 11% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
| Reviews · last 7 days | +15 | — |
| Reviews · last 30 days | +73 | — |
| Reviews · last 90 days | +269 | — |
Both Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer and MIT Canonical URLs offer paid plans only. Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer starts at Free plan available; MIT Canonical URLs starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; MIT Canonical URLs is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer has more onboarding documentation maturity (4,423 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (4,423 reviews). MIT Canonical URLs aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (0 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer and MIT Canonical URLs both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from MIT Canonical URLs" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
Great service, always get a quick response after each inquiry.
Great experience dealing with Christian
very great support tam and really been helpful and quick understanding the issue and provide quick support .
No reviews yet.
