Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer | Arc | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
| Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer | Arc | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Boost AEO & AI search visibility with AI SEO Audit Agent, On-Page SEO Optimizer, and SEO Checklist
| Metric | Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer | Arc: llms.txt |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 4.3k | 69 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 3 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | ★ 5 | 3 |
| Featured placements | 2 | — |
| Review velocity (30d) | 63 new | — |
| Languages | 14 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Apr 2020 | Jun 2025 |
Based on the data on this page, Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 4.9★ vs Arc: llms.txt's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer at Free plan available, Arc: llms.txt at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer has the larger user base (4,314 reviews vs 69), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Arc: llms.txt's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Arc: llms.txt's 69-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer audit • Arc: llms.txt audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer | Arc |
|---|---|---|
| ai | #16 | #182 |
| chatbot ai | #128 | #184 |
| ai support chatbot | #160 | #207 |
Not featured in any section recently.
| Signal | Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer | Arc |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.9 ★ (4.3k) | 4.5 ★ (69) |
| Rating distribution | 596% 43% 30% 20% 11% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
| Reviews · last 7 days | +10 | — |
| Reviews · last 30 days | +63 | — |
| Reviews · last 90 days | +255 | — |
Both Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer and Arc: llms.txt offer paid plans only. Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer starts at Free plan available; Arc: llms.txt starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 4,314 reviews) compared to Arc: llms.txt (4.5★ from 69 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Arc: llms.txt is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer has more onboarding documentation maturity (4,314 reviews vs 69), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (4,314 reviews). Arc: llms.txt aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (69 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
high quality , super customer support
Ricky, the engineer, is very professional and has helped me resolve a lot of issues. I hope everyone has a great day.
thanks to Ricky that help us to resolve few problems best support!
Viola and Penelope are the most supportive and helpful people I've ever met in my life that cleared up an issue in no time. The app is just beautiful and just what every store needs to become a SEO optimised boss!
easy to use and support and very helpful and responsive when help is needed. they offer a complete SEO solution. Thomas just helped me quite a bit in navigating FAQ and schema mark-up needs
No reviews yet.
Migration support varies by app and category. Avada AI SEO Image Optimizer and Arc: llms.txt both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Arc: llms.txt" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
