Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
All-in-one page builder to help merchants optimize their stores with beautiful landing pages.
| AfterShip Page Builder | NOMEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | AfterShip Page Builder | NOMEV |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 513 | 0 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | — |
| Listed features | ★ 5 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jun 2021 | May 2026 |
Based on the data on this page, AfterShip Page Builder is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 4.8★ vs NOMEV's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: AfterShip Page Builder at Free plan available, NOMEV at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. AfterShip Page Builder has the larger user base (513 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. NOMEV's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to AfterShip Page Builder; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — NOMEV's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than AfterShip Page Builder's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: AfterShip Page Builder audit • NOMEV audit
| Keyword | AfterShip Page Builder | NOMEV |
|---|---|---|
| page builder | #47 | Not ranked |
| quiz builder | #175 | Not ranked |
| ai quiz builder | #194 | Not ranked |
Both AfterShip Page Builder and NOMEV offer paid plans only. AfterShip Page Builder starts at Free plan available; NOMEV starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. AfterShip Page Builder fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; NOMEV is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. AfterShip Page Builder has more onboarding documentation maturity (513 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
AfterShip Page Builder typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (513 reviews). NOMEV aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (0 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. AfterShip Page Builder and NOMEV both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from NOMEV" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
