Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| ACF | XO Insert Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| ACF | XO Insert Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | ACF: Metafields Custom Fields | XO Insert Code |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 90 | ★ 103 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free to install | Free |
| Built for Shopify | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 4 | ★ 5 |
| Featured placements | — | 1 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Dec 2019 | Sep 2018 |
Based on the data on this page, XO Insert Code is the stronger choice for most Shopify App Store merchants — 5.0★ vs ACF: Metafields Custom Fields's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: ACF: Metafields Custom Fields at Free to install, XO Insert Code at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to XO Insert Code; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — ACF: Metafields Custom Fields's 90-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than XO Insert Code's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ACF: Metafields Custom Fields audit • XO Insert Code audit
| Keyword | ACF | XO Insert Code |
|---|---|---|
| metafields | #5 | Not ranked |
| metafield | #5 | Not ranked |
| product content | Not ranked | #5 |
| scripts | Not ranked | #10 |
| custom fields | #13 | Not ranked |
Not featured in any section recently.
Both ACF: Metafields Custom Fields and XO Insert Code offer paid plans only. ACF: Metafields Custom Fields starts at Free to install; XO Insert Code starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
XO Insert Code has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 103 reviews) compared to ACF: Metafields Custom Fields (4.5★ from 90 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. ACF: Metafields Custom Fields fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; XO Insert Code is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store marketplace. XO Insert Code has more onboarding documentation maturity (103 reviews vs 90), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
ACF: Metafields Custom Fields typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (90 reviews). XO Insert Code aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (103 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. ACF: Metafields Custom Fields and XO Insert Code both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from ACF: Metafields Custom Fields" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
