KL ‑ Nutrition Facts Label vs Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF)

KL ‑ Nutrition Facts Label edges out Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Pricing entry tiers: Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) at Free plan available, KL ‑ Nutrition Facts Label at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) has the larger user base (169 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. KL ‑ Nutrition Facts Label's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to KL ‑ Nutrition Facts Label; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF)'s 169-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than KL ‑ Nutrition Facts Label's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Shopify App Store listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) or KL ‑ Nutrition Facts Label cheaper?

Both Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) and KL ‑ Nutrition Facts Label offer paid plans only. Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) starts at Free plan available; KL ‑ Nutrition Facts Label starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) or KL ‑ Nutrition Facts Label?

KL ‑ Nutrition Facts Label has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) (4.8★ from 169 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) or KL ‑ Nutrition Facts Label?

KL ‑ Nutrition Facts Label holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) or KL ‑ Nutrition Facts Label?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Shopify App Store. Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) has the deeper published review base (169 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Shopify App Store merchants?

Accentuate Custom Fields (ACF) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (169 reviews). KL ‑ Nutrition Facts Label typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.