Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy | CloudyGPT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Automatically generate your most critical company documents, such as proposals and quotes, contracts, bills and invoices, and customer communications documents using pre-built or customized templates automatically populated with data from any source.
| Metric | Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy | CloudyGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 950 | 2 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 3 |
| Languages | 16 supported | 2 supported |
| Listed since | Nov 2009 | May 2024 |
CloudyGPT edges out Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy at paid, CloudyGPT at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy has the larger user base (950 reviews vs 2), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. CloudyGPT's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to CloudyGPT; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy's 950-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than CloudyGPT's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy audit • CloudyGPT audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy | CloudyGPT |
|---|---|---|
| chatbot | #93 | #15 |
| Signal | Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy | CloudyGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.7 ★ (950) | 5.0 ★ (2) |
| Rating distribution | 573% 418% 30% 20% 19% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
Billing Practices Are a Dealbreaker (Unauthorized Seat Added at Renewal) We’ve been a Conga customer for ~15 years, and I’m disappointed to say the billing experience has deteriorated to the point where I would not recommend this product based on account management and invoicing practices alone. At renewal, our invoi
Both Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy and CloudyGPT offer paid plans only. Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy starts at paid; CloudyGPT starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
CloudyGPT has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy (4.7★ from 950 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
CloudyGPT holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy has the deeper published review base (950 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Great product for creating documents and customize We have been using composer for 7 years and it is very helping our business teams to generate documents as per programs basis and launch them in prod quickly. Great product with features to taggle along multiple formats.
Great user experience Very intuitive
It is a very useful product We have extensively used the product
Great App Great App easy to use and intuitive user interface
No reviews yet.
Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (950 reviews). CloudyGPT typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy and CloudyGPT both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from CloudyGPT" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
