Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Centro | Subscribe, Rate, Feedback on Knowledge Article | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Your customers can subscribe an article/knowledge-base in portals. also, customers can rate the knowledge article and give feedback comments. Add on Feature for - Learning Management System(LMS) with interactive learning and Quiz for portal users
| Metric | Centro: Achieve Full Control Between Slack and Salesforce | Subscribe, Rate, Feedback on Knowledge Article |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 44 | 4 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | freemium |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | — |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Nov 2020 | Jan 2022 |
Centro: Achieve Full Control Between Slack and Salesforce edges out Subscribe, Rate, Feedback on Knowledge Article on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, Subscribe, Rate, Feedback on Knowledge Article offers a free tier (freemium) while Centro: Achieve Full Control Between Slack and Salesforce starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Centro: Achieve Full Control Between Slack and Salesforce; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Subscribe, Rate, Feedback on Knowledge Article's 4-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Centro: Achieve Full Control Between Slack and Salesforce's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Centro: Achieve Full Control Between Slack and Salesforce audit • Subscribe, Rate, Feedback on Knowledge Article audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Centro | Subscribe, Rate, Feedback on Knowledge Article |
|---|---|---|
| slack | #2 | Not ranked |
| microsoft teams | #3 | Not ranked |
| keeping teams | #3 | Not ranked |
| article | Not ranked | #4 |
| customers | Not ranked | #5 |
No tracked changes.
Subscribe, Rate, Feedback on Knowledge Article is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (freemium). Centro: Achieve Full Control Between Slack and Salesforce starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Centro: Achieve Full Control Between Slack and Salesforce has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 44 reviews) compared to Subscribe, Rate, Feedback on Knowledge Article (4.8★ from 4 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Centro: Achieve Full Control Between Slack and Salesforce holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Centro: Achieve Full Control Between Slack and Salesforce has the deeper published review base (44 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Centro: Achieve Full Control Between Slack and Salesforce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (44 reviews). Subscribe, Rate, Feedback on Knowledge Article typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Centro: Achieve Full Control Between Slack and Salesforce and Subscribe, Rate, Feedback on Knowledge Article both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Subscribe, Rate, Feedback on Knowledge Article" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.