Loading content…
Cooby vs Chargent Payment Processing
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Cooby | Chargent Payment Processing | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Cooby | Chargent Payment Processing | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
• PCI Compliant Credit Card & ACH Payments • Automated & Compliant Card Surcharging • Recurring Billing, Subscriptions Payments, & Automatic Payment Recovery • Self-Service Payments in Experience Cloud • 30+ Direct Payment Gateway Integrations
| Metric | Cooby: WhatsApp Integration with Salesforce | Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 529 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Nov 2022 | Mar 2009 |
Cooby: WhatsApp Integration with Salesforce and Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Pricing entry tiers: Cooby: WhatsApp Integration with Salesforce at paid, Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments has the larger user base (529 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Cooby: WhatsApp Integration with Salesforce 's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Cooby: WhatsApp Integration with Salesforce audit • Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Cooby | Chargent Payment Processing |
|---|---|---|
| ecommerce | Not ranked | #1 |
| commerce cloud | Not ranked | #1 |
| in real time | Not ranked | #1 |
| #10 | Not ranked | |
| and whatsapp | #11 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Both Cooby: WhatsApp Integration with Salesforce and Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments offer paid plans only. Cooby: WhatsApp Integration with Salesforce starts at paid; Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Cooby: WhatsApp Integration with Salesforce (5.0★, 1 reviews) and Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments (4.9★, 529 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Cooby: WhatsApp Integration with Salesforce fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments has more onboarding documentation maturity (529 reviews vs 1), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Cooby: WhatsApp Integration with Salesforce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (1 reviews). Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (529 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Cooby: WhatsApp Integration with Salesforce and Chargent Payment Processing: Credit Card, ACH, and Subscription Billing Payments both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Cooby: WhatsApp Integration with Salesforce " in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.