Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
The Lightning Knowledge Feedback app allows you to improve your Lightning Knowledge articles by collecting written feedback on article content and managing feedback resolution.
| Lightning Knowledge Feedback | Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Keep your focus on Salesforce while directly accessing your data in Teams, SharePoint sites, and Document Libraries. Easily work with the latest file versions with just one click. Compatible with all Salesforce Editions, including Mobile and Communities.
| Metric | Lightning Knowledge Feedback | Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 101 | 22 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free | paid |
| Pricing tiers | — | 17 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 7 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 6 supported |
| Listed since | Jul 2019 | Nov 2019 |
Based on the data on this page, Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs Lightning Knowledge Feedback's 3.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Lightning Knowledge Feedback offers a free tier (free) while Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Lightning Knowledge Feedback has the larger user base (101 reviews vs 22), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Lightning Knowledge Feedback's 101-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Lightning Knowledge Feedback audit • Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Lightning Knowledge Feedback | Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint |
|---|---|---|
| feedback | #1 | Not ranked |
| microsoft 365 | Not ranked | #2 |
| collaboration | #6 | Not ranked |
| teams | Not ranked | #6 |
| article | #7 | Not ranked |
Lightning Knowledge Feedback is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 22 reviews) compared to Lightning Knowledge Feedback (3.8★ from 101 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Lightning Knowledge Feedback has the deeper published review base (101 vs 22), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Lightning Knowledge Feedback typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (101 reviews). Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (22 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Lightning Knowledge Feedback and Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Q!365 | Integrate Microsoft 365, Teams & SharePoint" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.