Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Reputation Studio is the Salesforce-native Voice of Customer platform for managing product reviews, location reviews, app reviews, customer questions, and social feedback across 50+ channels. Centralize customer conversations inside Service Cloud.
| All-in-One Layouts [Calendar, Planner, Resource, Geomap] | Reputation Studio by 1440 | Customer Ratings and Reviews, Q&A, Social Comments | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Powerful Visualization for Salesforce data. 1) Calendar Layout for daily work activities 2) Planner Layout for planning campaigns and more 3) Geomap Layout for locating customers on a map 4) Resource Layout to view how resources are managed
| Metric | All-in-One Layouts [Calendar, Planner, Resource, Geomap] | Reputation Studio by 1440 | Customer Ratings and Reviews, Q&A, Social Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 12 | ★ 31 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 3 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 5 |
| Languages | 16 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Aug 2016 | Dec 2017 |
Based on the data on this page, Reputation Studio by 1440 | Customer Ratings and Reviews, Q&A, Social Comments is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs All-in-One Layouts [Calendar, Planner, Resource, Geomap]'s 3.9★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: All-in-One Layouts [Calendar, Planner, Resource, Geomap] at paid, Reputation Studio by 1440 | Customer Ratings and Reviews, Q&A, Social Comments at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Reputation Studio by 1440 | Customer Ratings and Reviews, Q&A, Social Comments; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — All-in-One Layouts [Calendar, Planner, Resource, Geomap]'s 12-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Reputation Studio by 1440 | Customer Ratings and Reviews, Q&A, Social Comments's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: All-in-One Layouts [Calendar, Planner, Resource, Geomap] audit • Reputation Studio by 1440 | Customer Ratings and Reviews, Q&A, Social Comments audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | All-in-One Layouts [Calendar, Planner, Resource, Geomap] | Reputation Studio by 1440 | Customer Ratings and Reviews, Q&A, Social Comments |
|---|---|---|
| layout | #1 | Not ranked |
| customer | Not ranked | #2 |
| social studio | Not ranked | #2 |
| your customer | Not ranked | #2 |
| layouts | #3 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Both All-in-One Layouts [Calendar, Planner, Resource, Geomap] and Reputation Studio by 1440 | Customer Ratings and Reviews, Q&A, Social Comments offer paid plans only. All-in-One Layouts [Calendar, Planner, Resource, Geomap] starts at paid; Reputation Studio by 1440 | Customer Ratings and Reviews, Q&A, Social Comments starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Reputation Studio by 1440 | Customer Ratings and Reviews, Q&A, Social Comments has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 31 reviews) compared to All-in-One Layouts [Calendar, Planner, Resource, Geomap] (3.9★ from 12 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Reputation Studio by 1440 | Customer Ratings and Reviews, Q&A, Social Comments holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Reputation Studio by 1440 | Customer Ratings and Reviews, Q&A, Social Comments has the deeper published review base (31 vs 12), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
All-in-One Layouts [Calendar, Planner, Resource, Geomap] typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (12 reviews). Reputation Studio by 1440 | Customer Ratings and Reviews, Q&A, Social Comments typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (31 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. All-in-One Layouts [Calendar, Planner, Resource, Geomap] and Reputation Studio by 1440 | Customer Ratings and Reviews, Q&A, Social Comments both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from All-in-One Layouts [Calendar, Planner, Resource, Geomap]" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.