Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta | Route | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
✔ Sync email and attachments to any Salesforce record ✔ Two-way sync between Salesforce and Google Calendar ✔ Salesforce email templates in Gmail ✔ Unlimited email tracking ✔ Gmail send later ✔ Email sequencing ✔ Personal meeting scheduler page
| Metric | Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta | Route Email2Case by Language |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 3.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 563 | 3 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | 3 | — |
| Languages | 16 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Jun 2014 | Dec 2017 |
Based on the data on this page, Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.8★ vs Route Email2Case by Language's 3.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Route Email2Case by Language offers a free tier (free) while Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta has the larger user base (563 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Route Email2Case by Language's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Route Email2Case by Language's 3-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta audit • Route Email2Case by Language audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
No features listed.
| Keyword | Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta | Route |
|---|---|---|
| email to case | #10 | #5 |
Route Email2Case by Language is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 563 reviews) compared to Route Email2Case by Language (3.7★ from 3 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 3.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta has the deeper published review base (563 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (563 reviews). Route Email2Case by Language typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Gmail and Google Calendar Integration by Ebsta and Route Email2Case by Language both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Route Email2Case by Language" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.