Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Work with Salesforce data directly in Excel. Import, export, bulk update records, run SOQL queries, and streamline repeatable data tasks.
| Apsona Multi-step Reporting | XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
Say hello to effortless reporting - without any limitations. With Multi-step Reporting, you can create sophisticated reports across multiple objects, all in a few clicks. It's time to make data-driven decisions without the data-driven headache.
| Metric | Apsona Multi-step Reporting | XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 31 | ★ 228 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | freemium |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 6 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Aug 2012 | Nov 2013 |
Apsona Multi-step Reporting and XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) are evenly matched on rating (4.7★ vs 4.8★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
On pricing, XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) offers a free tier (freemium) while Apsona Multi-step Reporting starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) has the larger user base (228 reviews vs 31), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Apsona Multi-step Reporting's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Apsona Multi-step Reporting audit • XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) audit
| Last updated |
|---|
| — |
| — |
| Keyword | Apsona Multi-step Reporting | XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) |
|---|---|---|
| data management | Not ranked | #2 |
| reporting and grant-making | #3 | Not ranked |
| multi-object | #5 | Not ranked |
| metadata management | Not ranked | #6 |
| data and metadata | Not ranked | #7 |
XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (freemium). Apsona Multi-step Reporting starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Apsona Multi-step Reporting (4.7★, 31 reviews) and XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) (4.8★, 228 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) has the deeper published review base (228 vs 31), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Apsona Multi-step Reporting typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (31 reviews). XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (228 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Apsona Multi-step Reporting and XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Apsona Multi-step Reporting" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
