Apsona Multi-step Reporting vs XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel)

Apsona Multi-step Reporting and XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) are evenly matched on rating (4.7★ vs 4.8★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.

On pricing, XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) offers a free tier (freemium) while Apsona Multi-step Reporting starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) has the larger user base (228 reviews vs 31), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Apsona Multi-step Reporting's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Apsona Multi-step Reporting or XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) cheaper?

XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (freemium). Apsona Multi-step Reporting starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Apsona Multi-step Reporting or XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel)?

Apsona Multi-step Reporting (4.7★, 31 reviews) and XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) (4.8★, 228 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.

Should I choose Apsona Multi-step Reporting or XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel)?

XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Apsona Multi-step Reporting or XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel)?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) has the deeper published review base (228 vs 31), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Salesforce AppExchange admins?

Apsona Multi-step Reporting typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (31 reviews). XL-Connector (formerly Enabler4Excel) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (228 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.