CV Timelogger vs Kantata SX (formerly Kimble PSA)

CV Timelogger edges out Kantata SX (formerly Kimble PSA) on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

On pricing, CV Timelogger offers a free tier (free) while Kantata SX (formerly Kimble PSA) starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to CV Timelogger; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Kantata SX (formerly Kimble PSA)'s 72-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than CV Timelogger's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Kantata SX (formerly Kimble PSA) or CV Timelogger cheaper?

CV Timelogger is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Kantata SX (formerly Kimble PSA) starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Kantata SX (formerly Kimble PSA) or CV Timelogger?

CV Timelogger has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Kantata SX (formerly Kimble PSA) (4.8★ from 72 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Kantata SX (formerly Kimble PSA) or CV Timelogger?

CV Timelogger holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Kantata SX (formerly Kimble PSA) or CV Timelogger?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Kantata SX (formerly Kimble PSA) has the deeper published review base (72 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Salesforce AppExchange admins?

Kantata SX (formerly Kimble PSA) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (72 reviews). CV Timelogger typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Kantata SX (formerly Kimble PSA) and CV Timelogger?

Migration support varies by app and category. Kantata SX (formerly Kimble PSA) and CV Timelogger both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from CV Timelogger" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.