Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Glance empowers customer-facing teams with in-the-moment collaboration inside Salesforce. Instantly launch cobrowsing, screen sharing, video, and more to guide customers, resolve issues faster, and drive better business outcomes—seamlessly and securely.
| Glance Cobrowse | CalendarAnything | Native Scheduling, Calendaring, Resource & Asset Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
All-in-one, native Salesforce scheduling and calendaring, cloud-agnostic and built for ANY object with a date/time field. Centralize scheduling, eliminate external booking tools, and drive adoption with a powerful, flexible calendar UI.
| Metric | Glance Cobrowse | CalendarAnything | Native Scheduling, Calendaring, Resource & Asset Management |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 185 | 181 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 9 | 9 |
| Languages | 6 supported | 11 supported |
| Listed since | Dec 2010 | Apr 2021 |
Glance Cobrowse edges out CalendarAnything | Native Scheduling, Calendaring, Resource & Asset Management on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: Glance Cobrowse at paid, CalendarAnything | Native Scheduling, Calendaring, Resource & Asset Management at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Glance Cobrowse; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — CalendarAnything | Native Scheduling, Calendaring, Resource & Asset Management's 181-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Glance Cobrowse's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Glance Cobrowse audit • CalendarAnything | Native Scheduling, Calendaring, Resource & Asset Management audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Glance Cobrowse | CalendarAnything | Native Scheduling, Calendaring, Resource & Asset Management |
|---|---|---|
| avoid the 500 | #10 | #6 |
| services | #5 | #12 |
| salesforce mobile | #11 | #6 |
| mobile | #8 | #9 |
| appointment | #119 | #6 |
No tracked changes.
Both Glance Cobrowse and CalendarAnything | Native Scheduling, Calendaring, Resource & Asset Management offer paid plans only. Glance Cobrowse starts at paid; CalendarAnything | Native Scheduling, Calendaring, Resource & Asset Management starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Glance Cobrowse has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 185 reviews) compared to CalendarAnything | Native Scheduling, Calendaring, Resource & Asset Management (4.8★ from 181 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Glance Cobrowse fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; CalendarAnything | Native Scheduling, Calendaring, Resource & Asset Management is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Glance Cobrowse has more onboarding documentation maturity (185 reviews vs 181), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Glance Cobrowse typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (185 reviews). CalendarAnything | Native Scheduling, Calendaring, Resource & Asset Management aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (181 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Glance Cobrowse and CalendarAnything | Native Scheduling, Calendaring, Resource & Asset Management both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from CalendarAnything | Native Scheduling, Calendaring, Resource & Asset Management" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.