Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Glance | Propel | PLM, QMS & PIM built natively on the Salesforce platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
Propel is the only solution that combines PLM, QMS, PIM and supplier management on the Salesforce platform - delivering a continuous product thread and easy collaboration across the entire value chain. Powered by Agentforce. Get a personalized demo today.
| Metric | Glance | Propel | PLM, QMS & PIM built natively on the Salesforce platform |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 185 | 76 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | paid | paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 9 | 9 |
| Languages | 6 supported | 10 supported |
| Listed since | Dec 2010 | Dec 2015 |
Glance and Propel | PLM, QMS & PIM built natively on the Salesforce platform are evenly matched on rating (4.9★ vs 4.9★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Pricing entry tiers: Glance at paid, Propel | PLM, QMS & PIM built natively on the Salesforce platform at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Glance has the larger user base (185 reviews vs 76), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Propel | PLM, QMS & PIM built natively on the Salesforce platform's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Glance audit • Propel | PLM, QMS & PIM built natively on the Salesforce platform audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Glance | Propel | PLM, QMS & PIM built natively on the Salesforce platform |
|---|---|---|
| product development | Not ranked | #1 |
| product cloud | Not ranked | #1 |
| product data | Not ranked | #2 |
| software on | #3 | Not ranked |
| highly | #4 | Not ranked |
Both Glance and Propel | PLM, QMS & PIM built natively on the Salesforce platform offer paid plans only. Glance starts at paid; Propel | PLM, QMS & PIM built natively on the Salesforce platform starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Glance (4.9★, 185 reviews) and Propel | PLM, QMS & PIM built natively on the Salesforce platform (4.9★, 76 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Glance fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Propel | PLM, QMS & PIM built natively on the Salesforce platform is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange marketplace. Glance has more onboarding documentation maturity (185 reviews vs 76), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Glance typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (185 reviews). Propel | PLM, QMS & PIM built natively on the Salesforce platform aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (76 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Glance and Propel | PLM, QMS & PIM built natively on the Salesforce platform both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Propel | PLM, QMS & PIM built natively on the Salesforce platform" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
