Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Ensure your users enter consistent address region names with validation and standardization features. No need to clean your existing data before implementing, clean as you go knowing all new data is validated.
| AddressTools Free | CPGvision | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
| Metric | AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite | CPGvision |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 251 | 9 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | free | paid |
| Pricing tiers | — | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | ★ 9 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 16 supported |
| Listed since | Jul 2009 | Sep 2013 |
AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite edges out CPGvision on rating (4.8★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite offers a free tier (free) while CPGvision starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite has the larger user base (251 reviews vs 9), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. CPGvision's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — CPGvision's 9-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite audit • CPGvision audit
| Listed |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | AddressTools Free | CPGvision |
|---|---|---|
| address | #2 | Not ranked |
| scenario planning | Not ranked | #2 |
| users to validate | #3 | Not ranked |
| ensure | #3 | Not ranked |
| agentic | Not ranked | #10 |
AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). CPGvision starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 251 reviews) compared to CPGvision (4.7★ from 9 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite has the deeper published review base (251 vs 9), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (251 reviews). CPGvision typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (9 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite and CPGvision both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from CPGvision" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
