Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ vs GetAccept Agent

Based on the data on this page, Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 5.0★ vs GetAccept Agent 's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, GetAccept Agent offers a free tier (free) while Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ has the larger user base (285 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. GetAccept Agent 's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — GetAccept Agent 's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ or GetAccept Agent cheaper?

GetAccept Agent is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ or GetAccept Agent ?

AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ does carry the larger published review base (285 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ or GetAccept Agent ?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ has the deeper published review base (285 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Salesforce AppExchange admins?

Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (285 reviews). GetAccept Agent typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ and GetAccept Agent ?

Migration support varies by app and category. Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ and GetAccept Agent both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from GetAccept Agent " in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.