Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ vs enosix Transact |SAP Integration Real-Time Bi-Directional- Error-Free Quoting

Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ and enosix Transact |SAP Integration Real-Time Bi-Directional- Error-Free Quoting are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.

Pricing entry tiers: Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ at paid, enosix Transact |SAP Integration Real-Time Bi-Directional- Error-Free Quoting at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ has the larger user base (285 reviews vs 4), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. enosix Transact |SAP Integration Real-Time Bi-Directional- Error-Free Quoting's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ or enosix Transact |SAP Integration Real-Time Bi-Directional- Error-Free Quoting cheaper?

Both Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ and enosix Transact |SAP Integration Real-Time Bi-Directional- Error-Free Quoting offer paid plans only. Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ starts at paid; enosix Transact |SAP Integration Real-Time Bi-Directional- Error-Free Quoting starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ or enosix Transact |SAP Integration Real-Time Bi-Directional- Error-Free Quoting?

Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ (5.0★, 285 reviews) and enosix Transact |SAP Integration Real-Time Bi-Directional- Error-Free Quoting (5.0★, 4 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.

Should I choose Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ or enosix Transact |SAP Integration Real-Time Bi-Directional- Error-Free Quoting?

enosix Transact |SAP Integration Real-Time Bi-Directional- Error-Free Quoting holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Conga CPQ (Configure Price Quote) | formerly Apttus CPQ or enosix Transact |SAP Integration Real-Time Bi-Directional- Error-Free Quoting?