User Fields History Tracking vs Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy

Based on the data on this page, Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.7★ vs User Fields History Tracking's 4.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, User Fields History Tracking offers a free tier (free) while Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy has the larger user base (950 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. User Fields History Tracking's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — User Fields History Tracking's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy or User Fields History Tracking cheaper?

User Fields History Tracking is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy or User Fields History Tracking?

Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 950 reviews) compared to User Fields History Tracking (4.2★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy or User Fields History Tracking?

Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 4.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy or User Fields History Tracking?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy has the deeper published review base (950 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.