Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- | Walnut | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
✓ Salesforce for Your Inbox Email Integration ✓ Sync Email, Calendar, & Tasks ✓ Calendar Scheduling & Lead Routing ✓ Email Tracking for Opens & Clicks ✓ AI Pre-Meeting Prep & Transcription ✓ Supports All Salesforce Editions & Clouds ✓ 14 Day Free Trial
| Metric | Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling | Walnut |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 443 | 0 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free_to_install |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | ★ 4 | 3 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Apr 2015 | Oct 2023 |
Based on the data on this page, Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.8★ vs Walnut's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Walnut offers a free tier (free_to_install) while Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling has the larger user base (443 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Walnut's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Walnut's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling audit • Walnut audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- | Walnut |
|---|---|---|
| email calendar | #5 | Not ranked |
| sync emails calendars | #8 | Not ranked |
| calendar sync | #9 | Not ranked |
| interactive | Not ranked | #11 |
| demo https | Not ranked | #11 |
No tracked changes.
Walnut is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free_to_install). Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling does carry the larger published review base (443 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling has the deeper published review base (443 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (443 reviews). Walnut typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Outlook, Gmail & Office 365-Sidebar- Email Tracking- Calendar Sync- Scheduling and Walnut both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Walnut" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
