Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker vs Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy

Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker edges out Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Pricing entry tiers: Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker at paid, Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy at paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy has the larger user base (950 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy's 950-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker or Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy cheaper?

Both Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker and Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy offer paid plans only. Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker starts at paid; Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy starts at paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker or Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy?

Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy (4.7★ from 950 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker or Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy?

Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Easy Tracking! Field History Tracker or Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Conga Composer | Document generation and reporting for Salesforce made easy has the deeper published review base (950 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.