SAP Emarsys Customer Engagement Cartridge for B2C Commerce vs Salesforce Pardot

Based on the data on this page, Salesforce Pardot is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.5★ vs SAP Emarsys Customer Engagement Cartridge for B2C Commerce's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, SAP Emarsys Customer Engagement Cartridge for B2C Commerce offers a free tier (free) while Salesforce Pardot starts at paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.

Salesforce Pardot has the larger user base (173 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. SAP Emarsys Customer Engagement Cartridge for B2C Commerce's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Salesforce Pardot; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — SAP Emarsys Customer Engagement Cartridge for B2C Commerce's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Salesforce Pardot's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is SAP Emarsys Customer Engagement Cartridge for B2C Commerce or Salesforce Pardot cheaper?

SAP Emarsys Customer Engagement Cartridge for B2C Commerce is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Salesforce Pardot starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Should I choose SAP Emarsys Customer Engagement Cartridge for B2C Commerce or Salesforce Pardot?

AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Salesforce Pardot does carry the larger published review base (173 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, SAP Emarsys Customer Engagement Cartridge for B2C Commerce or Salesforce Pardot?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. Salesforce Pardot has the deeper published review base (173 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Salesforce AppExchange admins?

SAP Emarsys Customer Engagement Cartridge for B2C Commerce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Salesforce Pardot typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (173 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between SAP Emarsys Customer Engagement Cartridge for B2C Commerce and Salesforce Pardot?

Migration support varies by app and category. SAP Emarsys Customer Engagement Cartridge for B2C Commerce and Salesforce Pardot both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from SAP Emarsys Customer Engagement Cartridge for B2C Commerce" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.