Loading content…
Add-On vs AddressTools Free
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Add-On | AddressTools Free | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Add-On | AddressTools Free | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed |
Ensure your users enter consistent address region names with validation and standardization features. No need to clean your existing data before implementing, clean as you go knowing all new data is validated.
| Metric | Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports | AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 251 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | paid | free |
| Listed features | ★ 9 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
| Listed since | Oct 2024 | Jul 2009 |
Based on the data on this page, AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite is the stronger choice for most Salesforce AppExchange admins — 4.8★ vs Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite offers a free tier (free) while Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports starts at paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite has the larger user base (251 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Salesforce AppExchange listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports audit • AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Add-On | AddressTools Free |
|---|---|---|
| address | Not ranked | #2 |
| users to validate | Not ranked | #3 |
| ensure | Not ranked | #3 |
| decision-making compliance reporting | #9 | Not ranked |
AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (free). Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports starts at paid. Both publish their pricing on the Salesforce AppExchange; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite does carry the larger published review base (251 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Salesforce AppExchange. AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite has the deeper published review base (251 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (251 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports and AddressTools Free: Address Validation and Standardisation Suite both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Add-On: Cuneiform for Salesforce: Data Health Reports" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.