Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
PandaDoc's document automation and CPQ solution streamlines creating, configuring, pricing, quoting, approving and eSigning proposals and contracts.
| Import2 | PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Import2 | PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 49 | ★ 1.2k |
| Free plan | — | — |
Import2 and PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ are evenly matched on rating (4.0★ vs 4.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ has the larger user base (1,225 reviews vs 49), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Import2's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most sales teams the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Pipedrive Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Import2 audit • PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ audit
Import2 (4.0★, 49 reviews) and PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ (4.0★, 1,225 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 4.0★. PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ does carry the larger published review base (1,225 vs 49). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Pipedrive Marketplace. PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ has the deeper published review base (1,225 vs 49), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Import2 typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (49 reviews). PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,225 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Import2 and PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Import2" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
