- Title Length43/50 chars
- Title Keywords4 keywords found
- Brand Name PositionTitle starts with a brand name
- Separator UsageUses separator to structure title
Loading content…
Quick verdict
Generated from PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ's audit data
PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ scores 36/100 across 6 category checks, which indicates listing-quality gaps across 3 of 6 audited categories. Strengths: title optimization (100/100) is the strongest category — installing for evaluation is fine, long-term confidence needs the gaps below addressed. Watch-items: languages (0/100) and description & content (10/100) drag the average down; lifting languages is the single largest available lever. Per-category breakdown below.
PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ
Independent listing audit — Pipedrive
36/100·grade D·audited today·0 changes in 30d
36/100
Grade D
Critical gaps
Overall
36/100
weighted across 6 areas
Grade
D
needs lift
Last audit
today
refreshed 1h ago
Changes
0 30d
view history →
This is an independent listing audit for PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ on Pipedrive. It scored 36/100 (grade D) on today's snapshot. Top strength: Title Optimization at 100/100. Biggest gap: Languages at 0/100. We re-audit every 24 hours from the canonical Pipedrive listing.
Section breakdown
Detailed checks & fixes
Track how this score changes over time
Get alerts when PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ or any rival changes their listing — free.
Methodology
Six weighted areas, pass / warning / fail per check, tiers at 85 / 65. Full methodology · Glossary
Explore further
HistoryPandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ changes0 updates in 30dAppsPandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ overviewReviews · keywordsBestTop Pipedrive appsBeyond PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQMethodologyHow we score6-area weighted rubricGlossaryAudit termsScore, tier, sections
Last updated: August 3, 2026
How PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ's 36/100 breaks down
PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ's overall score of 36/100 is a result that signals significant listing weaknesses across multiple categories, computed as the weighted average of 6 category checks. The spread is highly polarized across categories — 3 categories score above the headline number and 3 score below. The strongest category is Title Optimization (100/100, +64 vs overall); the weakest is Languages (0/100), a 36-point gap below the headline score — the largest single lever. Top three by score: Title Optimization (100), Visual Assets (50), Technical & Support (42).
Scoring criteria, category weightings, and the full rubric (identical across every Pipedrive Marketplace listing AppRanks audits) are documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: [email protected].
Frequently asked questions
What is PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ's Pipedrive App Store audit score?
PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ scored 36/100 in the AppRanks listing audit — a result that signals significant listing weaknesses. The score is the weighted average of 6 category checks: Title Optimization 100/100, Description & Content 10/100, Visual Assets 50/100, Categories & Discoverability 17/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. Each category is scored against a fixed rubric that is identical for every app on the platform, so scores are directly comparable across Pipedrive listings.
Explore further
- Compare PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ with another appStack PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ's title optimization score (100/100) against a rival listing on Pipedrive Marketplace.
- Browse Pipedrive Marketplace appsSee how other Pipedrive Marketplace listings handle languages — PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ's weakest category at 0/100.
- Audit metrics glossaryDefinitions for the Title Optimization and Languages checks used on this audit, plus the rest of the AppRanks vocabulary.
- PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ audit historyScore timeline for PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ — see whether the 36/100 result is improving, holding, or slipping.
- PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ on Pipedrive MarketplacePricing, features, ratings, and the live Pipedrive Marketplace marketplace summary for PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ.
- What is an audit score?Why PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ landed at 36/100 — the canonical definition, weightings, and refresh cadence.
- Top-rated Pipedrive Marketplace appsSee where PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ's weak 36/100 places it against the Pipedrive Marketplace's highest-rated apps.