What is PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ's Pipedrive App Store audit score?

PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ scored 61/100 in the AppRanks listing audit — a mid-tier result with room to improve. The score is the weighted average of 6 category checks: Title Optimization 100/100, Description & Content 80/100, Visual Assets 50/100, Categories & Discoverability 63/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. Each category is scored against a fixed rubric that is identical for every app on the platform, so scores are directly comparable across Pipedrive listings.

What is PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ doing well?

PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ's strongest audit area is Title Optimization, scored at 100/100. Of the 4 checks AppRanks runs in this category, 4 pass cleanly, with the remainder in warning rather than failing state. This is the dimension a competing listing would need to match before PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ loses its current edge in this category.

What can PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ improve?

The weakest area in PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ's audit is Languages, scored at 0/100. The failing checks are language count, each with a concrete fix described below. Tightening this category is the highest-impact change available to the listing — its weight in the overall score makes it the lever most likely to move the headline number on the next refresh.

AppRanks

PandaDoc - Proposals Listing Audit — 61/100

Quick verdict

Generated from PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ's audit data

PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ scores 61/100 across 6 category checks, which tracks in the middle band, with 3 of 6 categories below the headline. Strengths: title optimization holds at 100/100, so the listing isn't fundamentally broken — the lift is in tightening specific weaknesses. Watch-items: languages (0/100) and technical & support (42/100) drag the average down; lifting languages is the single largest available lever. Per-category breakdown below.

PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ

Independent listing audit — Pipedrive

61/100·grade C·★ 4 (1,225)·audited 3d ago·0 changes in 30d

View app

61/100

Grade C

Critical gaps

Overall

61/100

weighted across 6 areas

Grade

needs lift

Last audit

3d ago

refreshed 1h ago

Changes

0 30d

view history →

This is an independent listing audit for PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ on Pipedrive. It scored 61/100 (grade C) on today's snapshot. Top strength: Title Optimization at 100/100. Biggest gap: Languages at 0/100. We re-audit every 24 hours from the canonical Pipedrive listing.

Section breakdown

Detailed checks & fixes

Title Length43/50 chars
Title Keywords4 keywords found
Brand Name PositionTitle starts with a brand name
Separator UsageUses separator to structure title

Introduction148/200 chars
Intro Keywords13 unique keywords
Description1233/5000 chars — under 60% of limit
Description Keywords89 unique keywords
Demo StoreNo demo store URL

High impact

Description

Your description uses 1233 of 5000 characters. Expand it with features, benefits, and use cases.

App IconApp icon is set
Screenshot CountNo screenshots
Hero VideoNo video content found

High impact

Screenshot Count

Add at least 5 high-quality screenshots showing your app's key features and UI.

Category Count2 categories
Category NamesAll categories have names
Feature TagsNo feature tags
IntegrationsNo integrations listed

Medium impact

Feature Tags

Add feature tags that describe your app's capabilities for better search matching.

Demo StoreNo demo store
Privacy PolicyNo privacy policy
FAQNo FAQ
DocumentationNo documentation link
TutorialNo tutorial or guide
Pricing PlansNo pricing plans listed

Medium impact

Demo Store

Set up a demo store so merchants can preview your app before installing.

Language CountNo languages listed

Medium impact

Language Count

Add language support information. Multi-language apps reach significantly more merchants.

Track how this score changes over time

Get alerts when PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ or any rival changes their listing — free.

Start tracking free

Methodology

Six weighted areas, pass / warning / fail per check, tiers at 85 / 65. Full methodology · Glossary

Explore further

HistoryPandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ changes0 updates in 30d AppsPandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ overviewReviews · keywords BestTop Pipedrive appsBeyond PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ MethodologyHow we score6-area weighted rubric GlossaryAudit termsScore, tier, sections

Last updated: September 14, 2026

Quick verdict

PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ

How PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ's 61/100 breaks down

Frequently asked questions

What is PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ's Pipedrive App Store audit score?

What is PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ doing well?

What can PandaDoc - Proposals, e-signatures, and CPQ improve?

Explore further