Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
meeting links, recordings & transcripts for Google Meet in HubSpot
| Google Meet | Hotjar | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Google Meet | Hotjar |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.1 ★ | 3.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 433 | 12 |
| Active installs | 74,563+ | 9,223+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed since | Oct 2020 | Sep 2016 |
Google Meet edges out Hotjar on rating (4.1★ vs 3.9★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Google Meet at Free plan available, Hotjar at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Google Meet has the larger user base (433 reviews vs 12), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Hotjar's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Google Meet; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Hotjar's 12-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Google Meet's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical HubSpot App Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Google Meet audit • Hotjar audit
Both Google Meet and Hotjar offer paid plans only. Google Meet starts at Free plan available; Hotjar starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Google Meet has the higher average rating (4.1★ from 433 reviews) compared to Hotjar (3.9★ from 12 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Google Meet holds the higher average rating (4.1★ vs 3.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the HubSpot App Marketplace. Google Meet has the deeper published review base (433 vs 12), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Google Meet typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (433 reviews). Hotjar typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (12 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Google Meet and Hotjar both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Hotjar" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.