Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Send 2000+ personalized emails / day with Gmail™. Track opens & responses. Follow up.
| Mail Merge for Gmail | Poll | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Mail Merge for Gmail | Poll |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 3.2 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 6.1k | 32 |
| Active installs | 1,579,412+ | 6,041,224+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free of charge with paid features | Free of charge |
Based on the data on this page, Mail Merge for Gmail is the stronger choice for most Google Workspace Marketplace admins — 4.9★ vs Poll's 3.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Mail Merge for Gmail at Free of charge with paid features, Poll at Free of charge. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Mail Merge for Gmail has the larger user base (6,130 reviews vs 32), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Poll's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to Mail Merge for Gmail; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Poll's 32-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Mail Merge for Gmail's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Mail Merge for Gmail audit • Poll audit
| Keyword | Mail Merge for Gmail | Poll |
|---|---|---|
| chatbots | #29 | #38 |
| project | #31 | #40 |
Both Mail Merge for Gmail and Poll offer paid plans only. Mail Merge for Gmail starts at Free of charge with paid features; Poll starts at Free of charge. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Mail Merge for Gmail has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 6,130 reviews) compared to Poll (3.2★ from 32 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Mail Merge for Gmail holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 3.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Mail Merge for Gmail has the deeper published review base (6,130 vs 32), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Mail Merge for Gmail typically suits established teams with steady usage based on its published review base (6,130 reviews). Poll typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (32 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Mail Merge for Gmail and Poll both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Poll" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.