Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Its main functions are to facilitate the registration, modification, adhesion to groups and the elimination of users. Also the creation of shared folders,all in a massive, fast and easy way.
| Gestion en masa | Mazetec for Google Slides™ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
Turn your Slides into an interactive branching presentation, chatbot, role-plays, quizzes, games, homework exercises and more. Add a timer, points, choices, decision paths with different outcomes! !
| Metric | Gestion en masa | Mazetec for Google Slides™ |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 8 | ★ 9 |
| Active installs | 507,187+ | 15,793+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free of charge trial | Free of charge with paid features |
Gestion en masa and Mazetec for Google Slides™ are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: Gestion en masa at Free of charge trial, Mazetec for Google Slides™ at Free of charge with paid features. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most admins the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Gestion en masa audit • Mazetec for Google Slides™ audit
| Keyword | Gestion en masa | Mazetec for Google Slides™ |
|---|---|---|
| chatbot | Not ranked | #32 |
Both Gestion en masa and Mazetec for Google Slides™ offer paid plans only. Gestion en masa starts at Free of charge trial; Mazetec for Google Slides™ starts at Free of charge with paid features. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Gestion en masa (5.0★, 8 reviews) and Mazetec for Google Slides™ (5.0★, 9 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 5.0★. Mazetec for Google Slides™ does carry the larger published review base (9 vs 8). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Mazetec for Google Slides™ has the deeper published review base (9 vs 8), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Gestion en masa typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). Mazetec for Google Slides™ typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (9 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Gestion en masa and Mazetec for Google Slides™ both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Gestion en masa" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.