Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Form Ranger allows you to populate multiple choice, list, checkbox, and grid options from columns in any Google Sheet™ or Doctopus roster.
| Form Ranger | MathType | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Form Ranger | MathType |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.6 ★ | ★ 3.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 2.7k | 2.4k |
| Active installs | 49,098,355+ | 52,276,503+ |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free of charge | Free of charge trial |
MathType edges out Form Ranger on rating (3.9★ vs 3.6★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Form Ranger at Free of charge, MathType at Free of charge trial. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Form Ranger has the larger user base (2,706 reviews vs 2,435), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. MathType's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage admins who need fast install and low risk should default to MathType; mid-market and enterprise admins with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Form Ranger's 2,706-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than MathType's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Google Workspace Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Form Ranger audit • MathType audit
| Keyword | Form Ranger | MathType |
|---|---|---|
| form | #1 | Not ranked |
| forms | #1 | Not ranked |
| jotform | #1 | Not ranked |
Both Form Ranger and MathType offer paid plans only. Form Ranger starts at Free of charge; MathType starts at Free of charge trial. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
MathType has the higher average rating (3.9★ from 2,435 reviews) compared to Form Ranger (3.6★ from 2,706 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
MathType holds the higher average rating (3.9★ vs 3.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Google Workspace Marketplace. Form Ranger has the deeper published review base (2,706 vs 2,435), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Form Ranger typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2,706 reviews). MathType typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2,435 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Form Ranger and MathType both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from MathType" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.