- Title Length11/50 chars — under 50% of limit
- Title Keywords2 keywords — could add more
- Brand Name PositionTitle starts with a brand name
- Separator UsageNo separator found
Loading content…
Form Ranger scores 65/100 (grade C) — 3 fails and 11 warnings across 23 checks.
Biggest lever: Languages — fixing its one open check, Language Count (medium impact) is worth up to 10 points on the overall score.
Top strength: two sections score 88/100 — Description & Content and Visual Assets. Audited Oct 19, 2026.
6 weighted sections; each check scores pass / warning / fail. Strong at 85+, needs work at 65+. Full methodology · Glossary
Audited
Form Ranger's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade C). Top strength: two sections score 88/100 — Description & Content and Visual Assets. Biggest lever: Languages — fixing its one open check, Language Count (medium impact) is worth up to 10 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Technical & Support (up to 8.7 points), Title Optimization (up to 5.6 points), Categories & Discoverability (up to 5.6 points), Description & Content (up to 3.1 points) and Visual Assets (up to 2.5 points).
The rubric — its 6 sections, their weights, every check and the grade bands — is identical for every Google Workspace Marketplace listing and is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.
Form Ranger scores 65/100 (grade C) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 63/100, Description & Content 88/100, Visual Assets 88/100, Categories & Discoverability 63/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. The rubric is identical for every app on the platform, so scores are directly comparable.
two of Form Ranger's sections tie for the top score of 88/100: Description & Content and Visual Assets; 6 of 8 checks in them pass and 2 are open.
Languages: Language Count (No languages listed; medium impact). Fixing it is worth up to 10 points on the overall score — more than any other section; 5 other sections have smaller open fixes.