Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Tempo creates embedded solutions that enable organizations, including some of the world’s most prestigious brands, to track, plan, manage and understand time, their most constrained resource.
| Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking | Quantify TimeSpent | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Quantify captures user activity, ticket statuses and automatically detects who worked on what. This is the power of AI right in your Jira. It is optimized for full-time creative workers and provides robust reporting.
| Metric | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking | Quantify TimeSpent |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 ★ | ★ 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 896 | 33 |
| Active installs | 26,977+ | 1,361+ |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | From $1/yr | ★ Free |
| Pricing tiers | 6 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Quantify TimeSpent edges out Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking on rating (4.3★ vs 4.1★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, Quantify TimeSpent offers a free tier (Free) while Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking starts at From $1/yr. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the larger user base (896 reviews vs 33), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Quantify TimeSpent's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Quantify TimeSpent; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking's 896-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Quantify TimeSpent's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking audit • Quantify TimeSpent audit
| Keyword | Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking | Quantify TimeSpent |
|---|---|---|
| time | #7 | #13 |
Quantify TimeSpent is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking starts at From $1/yr. Both publish their pricing on the Atlassian Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Quantify TimeSpent has the higher average rating (4.3★ from 33 reviews) compared to Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking (4.1★ from 896 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Quantify TimeSpent holds the higher average rating (4.3★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking has the deeper published review base (896 vs 33), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (896 reviews). Quantify TimeSpent typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (33 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Timesheets by Tempo - Jira Time Tracking and Quantify TimeSpent both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Quantify TimeSpent" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.