Quantify TimeSpent Listing Audit: 54/100

Quick verdict

Quantify TimeSpent scores 54/100 (grade D) — 4 fails and 12 warnings across 22 checks.

Largest available rubric uplift: Visual Assets — fixing its two open checks (Screenshot Count and Hero Video) is worth up to 10 points on the overall score.

Top strength: Description & Content at 75/100. Audited Oct 22, 2026.

Top fixes

Language Count (Languages, medium impact, up to 10 points) — No languages listed
Screenshot Count (Visual Assets, high impact, up to 6.7 points) — No screenshots
Feature Tags (Categories & Discoverability, medium impact, up to 3.7 points) — No feature tags

How Quantify TimeSpent's 54/100 breaks down

Quantify TimeSpent's overall audit score is the weighted average of 6 section scores (grade D). Top strength: Description & Content at 75/100. Largest available rubric uplift: Visual Assets — fixing its two open checks (Screenshot Count and Hero Video) is worth up to 10 points on the overall score. Other sections with open checks: Languages (up to 10 points), Technical & Support (up to 8.7 points), Description & Content (up to 6.2 points), Title Optimization (up to 5.6 points) and Categories & Discoverability (up to 5.6 points).

The rubric — its 6 baseline-weighted sections, shared check definitions and grade bands — is consistent across Atlassian Marketplace listings, while eligibility and measured coverage can differ when a source snapshot lacks a field. It is documented on the methodology page and the audit-score glossary entry. Disputes or data corrections: corrections@appranks.io.

Frequently asked questions

What is Quantify TimeSpent's Atlassian listing audit score?

Quantify TimeSpent scores 54/100 (grade D) in the AppRanks listing audit. The score is the weighted average of 6 weighted sections: Title Optimization (15%), Description & Content (25%), Visual Assets (20%), Categories & Discoverability (15%), Technical & Support (15%), and Languages (10%). Section scores: Title Optimization 63/100, Description & Content 75/100, Visual Assets 50/100, Categories & Discoverability 63/100, Technical & Support 42/100, Languages 0/100. Scores are directly comparable when rubric version and coverage status match.

What is Quantify TimeSpent doing well?

Quantify TimeSpent's strongest section is Description & Content at 75/100; 2 of 4 checks in it pass and 2 are open.

What should Quantify TimeSpent fix first?

Visual Assets: Screenshot Count (No screenshots; high impact), Hero Video (No video content found; medium impact). Fixing them is worth up to 10 points on the overall score — the largest available rubric uplift; 5 other sections have smaller open fixes.

Quantify TimeSpent