draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts vs Quantify TimeSpent

Based on the data on this page, draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts is the stronger choice for most Atlassian Marketplace teams — 4.8★ vs Quantify TimeSpent's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, Quantify TimeSpent offers a free tier (Free) while draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts starts at From $0/yr. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the larger user base (1,204 reviews vs 33), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Quantify TimeSpent's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Quantify TimeSpent's 33-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts or Quantify TimeSpent cheaper?

Quantify TimeSpent is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts starts at From $0/yr. Both publish their pricing on the Atlassian Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts or Quantify TimeSpent?

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 1,204 reviews) compared to Quantify TimeSpent (4.3★ from 33 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts or Quantify TimeSpent?

draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts or Quantify TimeSpent?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. draw.io Diagrams | UML, BPMN, AWS, ERD, & Flowcharts has the deeper published review base (1,204 vs 33), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Atlassian Marketplace teams?