Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Workzone | ScriptRunner for Jira | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
ScriptRunner is the top scripting, automation and customisation app: Automate workflows, build custom fields and integrations with Groovy scripts and enhanced JQL. Execute admin and workflow functions without having to write a complete add-on.
| Metric | Workzone: PullRequest Workflow | ScriptRunner for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 4.6 ★ |
| Total reviews | 23 | ★ 826 |
| Active installs | 223+ | 35,011+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | — | From $0/yr |
| Pricing tiers | — | 6 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
Workzone: PullRequest Workflow edges out ScriptRunner for Jira on rating (4.8★ vs 4.6★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
ScriptRunner for Jira has the larger user base (826 reviews vs 23), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Workzone: PullRequest Workflow's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Workzone: PullRequest Workflow; mid-market and enterprise teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — ScriptRunner for Jira's 826-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Workzone: PullRequest Workflow's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Atlassian Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Workzone: PullRequest Workflow audit • ScriptRunner for Jira audit
| Keyword | Workzone | ScriptRunner for Jira |
|---|---|---|
| forms | Not ranked | #106 |
| form | Not ranked | #213 |
Workzone: PullRequest Workflow has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 23 reviews) compared to ScriptRunner for Jira (4.6★ from 826 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Workzone: PullRequest Workflow holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Atlassian Marketplace. ScriptRunner for Jira has the deeper published review base (826 vs 23), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Workzone: PullRequest Workflow typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (23 reviews). ScriptRunner for Jira typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (826 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Workzone: PullRequest Workflow and ScriptRunner for Jira both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Workzone: PullRequest Workflow" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.